View
More

Evening Standard: Registration flow

Assessing the newspapers online funnels to set it up for a future of online readers and subscribers.

Go to live form

About the Project

To understand our online readers better, and to provide them with the best personalised news service, there was a need to increase our number of registered users. Becoming a registered user gives you access to a number of benefits, such as exclusive newsletters and the ability to post comments.

Date:

March 2019

Client:

Evening Standard

Services:

Web Design

My Role

As a publication with a strong brand heritage, the Evening Standard has a large and loyal readership. While many commuters rely on the print edition, the shift to remote working during the Coronavirus pandemic saw a major increase in traffic to the Standard's website.

I was tasked with investigating why our digital registration journey was underperforming and to design a new, higher-performing version – one optimised specifically for mobile users.

Usability Testing

To uncover pain points in the existing registration flow, I conducted a series of usability testing sessions, asking users to complete the sign-up process and verbalise their thoughts.

The original journey involved two steps:

  1. An initial page asking whether the user already had an account
  2. The full registration form

Most users misunderstood the purpose of the first screen, assuming it completed the process. It added confusion rather than value and was therefore removed. Additionally, benefits of registering were presented too vaguely to drive action. I recommended these be distilled and integrated into the main form more effectively.

Identifying Frustration Themes

During testing, several specific fields emerged as sources of hesitation or confusion:

  • Year of birth - users didn’t understand why it was needed
  • Gender - many were uncomfortable or unwilling to provide this
  • Country of residence - seemed unnecessary without clear justification

To address this, I introduced clear helper and error messaging, explaining the reasons for collecting this data. We also removed or adapted certain fields:

  • The “Gender” field was eliminated, with "Title" used instead to infer gender when necessary
  • The "Username" field was removed entirely from the registration form, as it was only relevant for article commenting - users would instead choose a commenting name at the point of commenting
  • GA data showed few issues with password mismatches, so we switched to a single password field with visible characters, improving simplicity without sacrificing clarity
"To understand user frustrations with the current experience I ran a number of usability testing sessions, tasking users with completing the sign up process to understand where the journey was under performing."

Simplifying Information Architecture

The original form was too long and overwhelming. After streamlining the fields, I restructured the form to be as compact as possible, while staying true to our design system's spacing rules.

Key improvements included:

  • Highlighting core registration benefits at the top of the form
  • Offering a link to a full benefits page for users wanting more detail
  • Grouping related fields horizontally (e.g. "Title" and "First Name") to reduce vertical scrolling
  • Reducing total field count from 13 to 8, including the removal of the redundant pre-registration page

Prototyping and Iteration

I tested multiple prototypes with users to validate improvements. After refining error messages and field placements, the response was overwhelmingly positive. Users found the form:

  • Visually clean
  • Easy to understand
  • Shorter and more manageable on mobile

Key Results

  • Registration success rates increased by over 10% post-launch
  • Customer service complaints declined significantly, reducing pressure on internal teams
  • Early signs suggest continued improvement as further data is collected
No items found.